Multimedia Sanctuaries: With large files as daily bread, ext4 is indispensable. The only case where XFS is slower is when creating/deleting a lot of small files. - No RAID. Backward compatibility - Another benefit of using the Ext4 filesystem is its backward compatibility with the Ext3 and Ext2 systems. Using multiple drives of varying sizes created a luks1 encrypted ‘single’ data and dup meta volume. EXT4와 Btrfs는 서로 다른 유형의 문제를 해결하도록 설계되었습니다. ) TL, DR: All 3 major next gen CoW file systems have their advantages and drawbacks, and I figure integrating them into my workflow is the only way to fairly evaluate them see how they work for myself. BTRFS subvolumes and the way a distro like Opensuse handles it, by using subvolumes and snapshotting on upgrades, is really nice. The PostgreSQL database server ran well particularly on EXT4 and XFS while F2FS on the USB 3. It is a very good filesytem, it's just lacking a lot of "modern" features, like snapshots or subvolumes. ext4 is not recommended. Delay allocation. Journaling ensures file system integrity after system crashes (for example, due to power outages) by keeping a record of file system. However, XFS is amazingly fast in the insertion phase as well as the workload execution phase. I've compiled in tmpfs for over a decade now. Compared to ext4, XFS has unlimited inode allocation, advanced allocation hinting (if you need it) and, in recent version, reflink support (but they need to be explicitly enabled in. Personal data is irreplaceable. Ext4, while. It's a mature filesystem and offers online defragmentation and can. In the time since I chose ext4 for these systems, btrfs seems to have come a long way, so the choice may be harder today. Per the recommendation from RedHat: Another way to characterize this is that the Ext4 file system variants tend to perform better on systems that have limited I/O capability. It you have huge hard drives, BTRFS supports up to 16 times larger size than 1 EXT4 partition. This pre-dates xfsprogs 3. But they come with the smallest set of features compared to newer filesystems. • 3 mo. The snapshots do not take up any space. Btrfs, EXT4, XFS, F2FS, and NILFS2 were tested on a Linux 5. Windows users don’t have much of a choice regarding a file system. Thanks again! Unless you're doing something crazy, ext4 or btrfs would both be fine. EXT4 had the best speed at 58MB/s while Btrfs came in slightly behind that at 52MB/s and then ZFS came in at 46MB/s. 4 To 4. Mount ntfs drives only read only. Btrfs come with compression algorithms present in the filesystem, allowing data to be compressed at the filesystem level right when written to the system. If you omit the size parameter, a journal size based on the size of the file system is used. Business, Economics, and Finance. Each of the five file-systems were tested on the same NVM Express SSD from the Linux 4. 38. XFS scales much better on modern multi-threaded workloads. However, Ext3 lacks advanced file system features like extent blocking mapping, dynamic allocation inode, and defragmentation. In summary, both Btrfs and Ext4 are good options for your NAS, and the choice between the two ultimately depends on your specific needs and use case. The most commonly used are Ext4, Btrfs, XFS, and ZFS which is the most recent file system released back in 2018. For the adventurous: you can define block devices on btrfs and use ext4 on those block devices (ext4 on btrfs). Main features: Data protection features, including snapshot, replication, and point-in-time recovery. btrfs 可以支援 snapshot, 但 ext4 不行, 如果一開始就採用 ext4, 日後如果要使用 snapshot 功能, 必須將 NAS 的資料備份出來, 重新 format 成 btrfs 格式. For example btrfs supports transparent file compression. Tuy nhiên, đối với phân vùng /home chứa các file cá nhân, openSUSE đã quyết định sử dụng hệ thống file XFS thay thế. Btrfs vs Ext4. for data security and integrity zfs is the best. Btrfs trails the other options for a database in terms of latency and throughput. ext3 is the most common format. you don't have to think about what you're doing because it's what. It’s an improved version of the older Ext3 file system that includes a lot of great features, including ones for Solid State Drives (SSDS). 0, XFS is the default file system instead of ext4. To reserve an external journal with a specified size when you create an XFS file system, specify the -l logdev=device,size=size option to the mkfs. Snapraid says if the disk size is below 16TB there are no limitations, if above 16TB the parity drive has to be XFS because the parity is a single file and EXT4 has a file size limit of 16TB. Interestingly, the first version of the Ext4 filesystem, the Extended filesystem (“Ext”), came out in 1992 for the Minix OS. However, when we review EXT4 vs BTRFS, here’s the downside: BTRFS has disk and volume management built-in, while EXT4 is a “pure filesystem”. Btrfs vs. So if you are after the most speed for the buck and if your NAS is already doing RAID 5 or more, you could go for Ext4. AdamV158. In a few words, I just need a really reliable and fast filesystem for years ahead, with the care of SSD in mind, I need it mostly for gaming, video-audio production, working with a lot of small/medium files (from 100-500Kb to 100-150Gb) sending them. Silent data corruption, sometimes referred to as bitrot, is more. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. @taffer Your "recent benchmark" is from April 2015, over three years old and uses XFS with only default options. Btrfs provides checksums for data and metadata, ensuring enhanced data integrity. XFS. EXT4 is better in the general case. Comparing the two is a semi-futile exercise. Between 2T and 4T on a single disk, any of these would probably have similar performance. 0 hard drive when using EXT4 and XFS. Btrfs（技术预览）" 6. Btrfs Format은 데이터 관리와 안정성을 강화한 파일 시스템으로 파일 관리가 중요한 NAS 시스템에서 가장 적합한 포맷입니다. I'd say ext, because it is faster, and because you asking means, that you don't know how to use btrfs features, otherwise the choice is obvious: need snapshots -> btrfs, need reflinks -> XFS, default -> ext4. But… Some different plus for BTRFS Backup is about data safety. Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS were tested in their out-of-the-box state / default mount options. 7. This is just an additional protection. 15 Comparing KPTI/Retpoline. The XFS one on the other hand take around 11-13 hours!With Bcachefs on its trek towards the mainline Linux kernel, this week I conducted some benchmarks using the very latest Bcachefs file-system code and compared its performance to the mainline Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS file-system competitors on both rotating and solid-state storage. . Btrfs, ZFS, and bcachefs are probably your best bets out of the 19 options considered. 04 Disco Dingo was running on the Threadripper setup while using the Linux Git kernel from the mainline PPA. Use xfs_info to verify that the ftype option is set to 1. XFS for data, because XFS is a damn good filesystem for data and doesn't have the few edge cases that btrfs does where it sometimes isn't the best filesystem for certain profiles for example, databases, lots of tiny writes have a sometimes will slow down a btrfs filesystem. 数据场和大存储池会揭示关于 ext4、XCF 以及 btrfs 不同的场. The most commonly used are Ext4, Btrfs, XFS, and ZFS which is the most recent file system released back in 2018. Btrfs is newer and more experimental, but offers advanced capabilities like snapshots, checksums, and inline compression. file-system comparison, here are some fresh benchmarks looking at the Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS file-system benchmarks on a speedy WD_BLACK SN850 NVMe. • 3 mo. 3TB HDD formatted as NTFS for main files. ZFS & BTRFS (and maybe BCACHEFS) present an entirely new and generally superior paradigm. Both cases, a mechanical drive. because it spans multiple partitions, it's less likely to fill up your hard drive. I am getting too many input/output errors with my 3TB HDD NTFS hard disk for main files. Use XFS for your array drives and Btrfs for your cache pool. xfs command. 0. Compared to Ext4, XFS has a relatively poor performance for single threaded, metadata-intensive workloads. The XFS File System. Ext4 specially without a journal and XFS are both extremely fast. Ext4 fs can read and write to Ext2 or Ext3 file systems, but the Ext4 it is not compatible with Ext2 and Ext3 drivers. Btrfs (pronounced as Butter FS, Better FS, or B-Tree FS) Considering that the btrfs will be able for spanning over the multiple hard drives, it is a very good poit that it can support 16 times more drive space than the ext4. I am getting too many input/output errors with my 3TB HDD NTFS hard disk for main files. Although Btrfs lacks stability and maturity as of this writing, it is more feature-rich than EXT4 despite this. Btrfs和Ext4都是优秀的文件系统，但在选择时需要考虑您的具体需求和使用场景。. For zfs there is a plugin. It's a filesystem which resides entirely in your RAM. 0 mainline kernel and using the stock mount options. removes the need for LVM and thus eliminates 1 layer for filesystem-ing (if that’s a word) On top of that, in 2008, the principal developer of EXT3 and. Btrfs vs Ext4. Yes Ext4 is much easier to setup but BTRFS has its advantages. 84 nvme drives split up into a small ext4 volume and the rest is btrfs. . Uma das decisões que você tem que tomar quando vai instalar qualquer distro Linux é o Sistema de arquivos do Linux! São vários para escolher, EXT4, XFS e BTR. Linux EXT4/Btrfs RAID With Twenty SSDs Storage :. XFS. The XFS supports more file sizes and greater file or partition sizes. Ext4, Btrfs, and XFS are three widely used file systems in Linux. Reliable! I used it in Rsync mode as only my backup disk is btrfs, everything else was ext4 or XFS. Ext4 comes up with some new and improved features such as: Extent-based. To reserve an external journal with a specified size when you create an XFS file system, specify the -l logdev=device,size=size option to the mkfs. Ext4 is the default filesystem in Manjaro at the moment. BTRFS hatte auch etwas höhere Latenz als EXT4, was bedeutet, dass es länger dauerte, bis Dateien auf dem Dateisystem zugegriffen werden konnten. 240GB SSD formatted as EXT4 for main OS. Ext4 and XFS are the fastest, as expected. 5. It's boring, not flashy, and just stable, which is exactly what you want for the root partition. ) XFS. For anything with higher capability, XFS tends to be faster. BTRFS has better backup capabilities, but is considered less stable, despite it working for me just fine with my testing of it. Backups and CoW, are why I use btrfs. A) crater. use ZFS only w/ ECC RAM. Linux 5. zfs not. Regarding filesystems. 가능. . Use XFS for your array drives and Btrfs for your cache pool. Die Funktionen umfassen eine transparente Komprimierung, Prüfsummen und. all kinds for nice features (like extents, subsecond timestamps) which ext3 does not have. But unless you intend to use these features, and know how to use them, they are useless. My current setup is /@ for the rootfs, /@home for home dir, works great. I've heard good things about BTRFS, and I'd use XFS but I dislike that it takes an significant % of the free-space off the bat. Not a ton of bells and whistles, but they Just Work. . ago. Using: - A full partition in a single 1TB or 2TB NVMe SSD. Ext4: cũng giống như Ext3, lưu giữ được những ưu điểm và tính tương thích ngược với phiên bản trước đó. My problem is that in some games when DXVK is running in Linux, stutters occur, although there are no such problems on Windows. When running PostMark, ZFS came out far ahead of the UFS file-systems being more than ten times faster than. All have pros and cons. Unless you're doing something crazy, ext4 or btrfs would both be fine. Approach 2: Readjust things so the kernel and modules are on an ext4 filesystem and the data you most want to compress is on a btrfs partition. Btrfs' RAID on Linux 5. The NTFS support was powered by FUSE. And the I discovered how many tools are out there to recover data from EXT partitions and how few for XFS. The chart below displays the difference in terms of hard drive space reserved for redundancy. I understand if I use zfs/btrfs i will miss out on any data redundancy features but maybe pick up some added features like better consistency, snapshots, ect or should I just stick with ext4. It is backward-compatible with older versions of Ext. Though personally I'd still go with ext4 primarily because despite recognizing some potential benefits of btrfs, I really don't see them as important for how I use my computers. 0 NVMe SSD was used for the benchmarking of these file-systems in different desktop use-cases. Potential for data loss: While btrfs has features to protect against data loss, these features can be complex to configure and may not always work as intended, leading to the possibility of data loss. . So I moved everything off of it and formatted it into XFS and ate the 0,5% space loss for peace of mind. Not just permissions, but moving them or getting file sizes, too. It can create, diff and restore snapshots and provides timelined auto-snapping. ZFS is open source, it isn't "owned" by Oracle. Tính năng tự khôi phục tập tin. For these reasons, Fedora has made BTRFS the standard filesystem in their newer releases. For more than 3 disks, or a spinning disk with ssd, zfs starts to look very interesting. However, we also must admit that Btrfs has many advantages that Ext4 doesn’t have, for example: The question is XFS vs EXT4. Ext3 should be out, too, since it's been replaced by ext4. You can easily backup each distro without filling your disk using snapshots. 再將資料再回存到 NAS, 這部份會花費很多時間. With disks as fast as NVMe you probably won't notice much difference in drive speeds between btrfs, f2fs, ext4, etc unless you have some extremely disk-bound workload. Phoronix: Linux 5. Both. The ext4 file system is still fully supported in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 and can be selected at installation. XFS vs. Ext3 and Ext4 perform better on limited bandwidth (< 200MB/s) and up to ~1,000 IOPS capability. It is a copy-on-write (CoW) filesystem supporting. The main thing is to use latest Linux kernels to avoid old kernel Btrfs implementation. Now I may send the snapshots also to an local device (formatted in Btrfs). . The Ext4 File System. That's right, XFS "repairs" errors on the fly, whereas ext4 requires you to remount read-only and fsck. It is backward-compatible with older versions of Ext. I've read and have anecdotally (not scientific and could be affected by other things) experienced Btrfs being slower than ext4. The Ext4 File System. XFS is a robust and mature 64-bit journaling file system that supports very large files and file systems on a single host. e. 2. are two different decisions you have to make. Vide. In terms of XFS vs Ext4, XFS is superior to Ext4 in the following. We’ll go over each file system in more detail ahead. Unfortunately you will probably lose a few files in both cases. OMV supports btrfs but you still have to scrub etc yourself from the command line. ReiserFS is another filesystem common to linux systems, but with some ongoing codebase issues whereby it periodically tries to kill your wife. . Ext4 比 Btrfs 更穩定嗎？ 儘管在撰寫本文時 Btrfs 缺乏穩定性和. It does its job well. what i found is that ext3 lost around 5-10 files out of every million, XFS around 5-30 per million and both Reiser and JFS went to several hundreds, a thousand lost files in at least one case. org and zfsonlinux. SSD Disk Observations. So I did two rounds: the. repeat with all candidate filesystems in my case it was ext3, XFS, ReiserFS and JFS. 0 SSD drive used was a 250GB Samsung 850 PRO solid-state drive connected both. There’s very little difference between EXT4 and XFS, both in total throughput and behavior over time. yield a very fast imaging backup. A maximum. What we mean is that we need something like resize2fs (ext4) for enlarge or shrunk on the fly, and not required to use another filesystem to store the dump for the resizing. F2FS With Linux 4. 多设备的集成卷管理 Expand section "6. It has features that can scale better than ext4 and is even preferred over ZFS by some users. Tích hợp Cloud Station Server, Drive mang hiệu quả cao. Linux provides the statx(2) system call interface for retrieving the file birth time for filesystems that support it since kernel version 4. Depends on what you're looking for. ran btrfs balance to balance all btrfs volumes. org Phoronix Test Suite Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4. Two subvolumes, root and home, are created from that pool and mounted at / and /home respectively. EXT4. 1. Changing the storage driver will make any containers you have already created inaccessible on the local system. 88. ran defragment utility to compress all existing files. Also, reducing the life of my SSD by a month is worth winning an argument from which I get absolutely no benefit. Never use ReiserFS on a new system and if you are currently using it, consider converting it to XFS or Btrfs. ZFS vs EXT4 vs BTRFS File Systems Perhaps these types of file systems are strange or unknown to you, normal, since they are used in the environment of servers, NAS and Linux systems in general. As a reminder, luks encrypted partition are not dependent on the used file system (ext3/ext4/etc. However, the performance of ZFS on FreeBSD/PC-BSD 8. Also, on ZFS, in Linux, it takes some tweaking to get it performing good, so I would suggest to go btrfs or XFS. ZFS combines a filesystem and volume manager. It you have huge hard drives, BTRFS supports up to 16 times larger size than 1 EXT4 partition. 0-040700-generic (x86_64) Unity 7. The only realistic benchmark is the one done on a real application in real conditions. But. XFS is special because it supports massive file systems, with file sizes of up to 8 exabytes supported. ZFS certainly can provide higher levels of growth and resiliency vs ext4/xfs. F2FS vs. It supports large file systems and provides excellent scalability and reliability. EarthyFeet. 這裡有 4 個關於 EXT4 和 Btrfs 的附加問題。在這裡查看答案。 1. The total throughput is better than with ZFS (40k vs 60k), but the jitter is more severe. Ext4 focuses on providing a reliable and stable file system with good performance. Crypto2. 其他 ext4 文件系统实用程序 6. Yes Ext4 is much easier to setup but BTRFS has its advantages. Personally I run btrfs on all my Linux devices, some of them with half-decade old installations of Arch and they've all performed admirably. This article provides a detailed comparison of XFS vs btrfs to help you determine which file system is a better fit for your use case. Die Benchmark-Testergebnisse zeigten, dass BTRFS etwas niedrigere Lese- und Schreibgeschwindigkeiten als EXT4 hatte. The SATA 3. Additional mount points using Btrfs will also have corresponding subvolumes created based on the Name field. 356 Btrfs—short for "B-Tree File System" and frequently pronounced "butter" or "butter eff ess"—is the most advanced filesystem present in the mainline Linux kernel. 불가능. Furthermore, the Ext4 is designed to be backward compatible. OMV4 or OMV5. Ext4 is probably the final evolution of the ext filesystem (which started with ext, then ext2, ext3, and now ext4). EXT4 still performs better than BTRFS. to add to the confusion: one actually could use btrfs to act like some sort of raid ;-) I would not use btrfs for that anyway. That is according to my quick read of various Phoronix tests. It was also during a power outage, and yes I should have had that. Moreover, the ext4 is more beneficial when the. The XFS file system is loved in the Linux community for its ability to handle and manage significant. For example, my virtualization server is currently hyper-v and I use ReFS instead of NTFS for features like bitrot protection, checksums, ect. 1. Currently I'm running on LVM with SSD caching and ext4 fs. XFS on the other hand is older, so more "mature. Precisely, it seems to be 50%. XFS는 1993년 Silicon Graphics에서 개발한 고성능의 64bit 저널링. Though EXT4 has few strong capabilities, it is reliable and well-maintained across all Linux operating systems. file-system comparison, here are some fresh benchmarks looking at the Btrfs, EXT4,btrfs is also slower in some benchmarks but I very much doubt thats visible in normal use. On the other hand, for Linux/Unix-based devices, it might be a bit of a challenge choosing one among many options. ext4 파일 시스템은 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5에서 사용 가능한 기본 ext3 파일 시스템의 확장된 버전입니다. 3TB HDD formatted as NTFS for main files. Además, el rendimiento en una sola unidad giratoria generalmente tendrá la unidad como el eslabón más débil. btrfs has the "btrfs-balance" command. Performance: Ext4 performs better in everyday tasks and is faster for small file writes. 여러 가지의 HDD를 장착하여 사용을 하신다면 사진이나 중요한 자료들을 저장하는 드라이브에는. Let’s go through the different features of the two filesystems. Have snapper to create pre/post BTRFS and LVM snapshots. It was later developed for Linux. With not having the time to conduct the usual kernel version vs. 00GHz (8 Cores) MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1. org. Interestingly ZFS is amazing for. Files less than ~2KiB can be stored in the metadata section (“inline” in the b-tree nodes), so as not to waste most of a block. File Size: Ext4 supports file size up to 16 TiB, while Btrfs. 10 4. XFS, EXT4, and BTRFS are file systems commonly used in Linux-based operating systems. Choosing between them can be difficult as each has its own advantages and disadvantages. I've used EX4, XFS, EXT4+LVM and now I'm under BTRFS, and I can tell you, TF2, CSGO, Factorio, KSP, etc, all perform the same under all of them. Phoronix: Linux 4. A daily snapshot of Ubuntu 19. So please enlighten me, where is btrfs better and where is it worse or just significantly different than ZFS. ext4 is an "advanced" version of ext3 with various improvements, basically an upgrade to the ext3 format. Then later, I was actually able to convert that from btrfs-raid10. (當然另一種做法是新增硬碟, 另外格式化為 btrfs. X percent… The more modern filesystems of BTRFS and ZFS not only have data integrity features but also the inline compression pushes the efficiency past 100% in many cases. In the case of the Intel 900p SSD, the XFS results were too fast to accurately measure while EXT4 and F2FS took just two seconds to complete while Btrfs took six seconds. For a future article will be a look at non-mainlined file-systems,. ext4 can claim historical stability, while the consumer advantage of btrfs is snapshots (the ease of subvolumes is nice too, rather than having to partition). I use ext4 everywhere. 6 Comments With FS-Mark there was a very noticeable drop with the XFS file-system with KPTI and Retpoline enabled while EXT4 saw the second largest drop while Btrfs and. EXT4. XFS as a similar featureset filesystem manages around 99. On the other hand, EXT4 handled contended file locks about 30% faster than XFS. 1. 0 SSD drive used was a 250GB Samsung 850 PRO solid-state drive connected both via SATA and then a SATA. XFS vs. Worthy mentions on the functionality front include: Copy-on-write: Btrfs uses copy-on-write to create system snapshots without duplicating data and wasting space. I've seen benchmarks (eg: this one) that put btrfs considerably slower than ext4. btrfs 当然值得尝试、但要在桌面 Linux 上完全取代 ext4 可能还需要一些时间。. EXT4 vs. I'll be going RAID 6. BTRFS VS EXT4 performance in Raid 1. Never use ReiserFS on a new system and if you are currently using it, consider converting it to XFS or Btrfs. Обзор Ext4 vs Btrfs vs XFS. Regardless what I'm doing the maximum transferrate (write) is between 40-60MB on ZFS. Btrfs Benchmarks comparison, here is a wider look at mainline file-systems on the Linux 4. And ext3. NTFS OpenBenchmarking. For a consumer it depends a little on what your expectations are. Reasons why I avoided btrfs:Btfs not meant to replace ext4, they are in a different category, ext4 is simple, old and stable while btrfs brings new ideas and goes into very different direction. Ext4 file system is the successor to Ext3, and the mainstream file system under Linux. With not having the time to conduct the usual kernel version vs. El ext4 y xf. ext4 with m=0 ext4 with m=0 and T=largefile4 xfs with crc=0 mounted them with: defaults,noatime defaults,noatime,discard defaults,noatime results show really no difference between first two, while plotting 4 at a time: time is around 8-9 hours. ZFS on FreeBSD may be faster than BTRFS on Linux. (For example, you might have an ext4 root filesystem, but store most of your data on a zfs or btrfs pool. Data Colossi & Data Centers: Ext4 is non-negotiable for handling extensive data transactions. Regarding boot drives : Use enterprise grade SSDs, do not use low budget commercial grade equipment. Running this fio command, I get about 2. g. When running PostMark, ZFS came out far ahead of the UFS file-systems being more than ten times faster than. I have a raid 1 setup on dual 3. BTRFS also had somewhat higher latency than EXT4, meaning that it took longer for files to be accessed on the file system. My recommendation of that list would be XFS. Januar 2020. On the other hand, backup of xfs to xfs allows you certain features that. Across the three tested RAID modes, EXT4 was performing the worst. It would be interesting to see a new benchmark result of CoW filesystems BTRFS vs ZFS in real world 2022. I was using NTFS due to compatibility. Ceph's recommendation for the choice of filesystem is between btrfs and XFS. In some areas Btrfs was showing great improvements in performance, especially for the RAID setup, but it still lacked in some other areas. Each of these file systems has its own way of organizing data, merits, and demerits. Btrfs is the recommended file system to use in most scenarios. Btrfs（技术预览）" Collapse section "6. ext4 is not recommended. I have a raid 1 setup on dual 3. Because ext4 can't beat btrfs when it comes to snapshot/delete. Ext4: cũng giống như Ext3, lưu giữ được những ưu điểm và tính tương thích ngược với phiên bản trước đó. Hello everyone, The time has come again for me to reinstall arch once more. EXT4 has been the Linux default since 2006, following the previous EXT3. All of these Linux. Granted, i just use the automatic partition creater at setup, so it still uses ext4 for the /boot and /boot/efi partitions. ext4 with m=0 ext4 with m=0 and T=largefile4 xfs with crc=0 mounted them with: defaults,noatime defaults,noatime,discard defaults,noatime results show really no difference between first two, while plotting 4 at a time: time is around 8-9 hours. Small to Medium Enterprises: While ext3 suffices for businesses with modest data needs, scalability visionaries would do well considering ext4. Though not as large of a difference when comparing to an SD card. BTRFS is newer, and the performance is not as good in many cases, but it is not far off. XFS File System Support for large file sizes - The Ext4 supports a single file size of up to 16 TiB ( Tebibytes ) whereas XFS supports a max file size of up to 8 exbibytes. Boot from an install CD, then convert by doing: # btrfs-convert /dev/ partition. Btrfs is one of the most popular newly created file systems, and was. Either way you go, just leave EXT4 where it is, in the ground. In the time since I chose ext4 for these systems, btrfs seems to have come a long way, so the choice may be harder today. XFS.